Back to search
[2025] EAT 206Claimant Successful

Miss April Freke

25 November 2026England & WalesEmployment Judge THE HON. LORD FAIRLEY, PRESIDENT
GOV.UK

Case Summary

The claimant succeeded in her claims of sexual harassment against the first respondent, who was a director and owner of the second respondent employer. The tribunal accepted the claimant's uncontradicted evidence in relation to one of the eight incidents of harassment, and considered the totality of the course of conduct in assessing the claimant's credibility.

Key Issues

  • sexual harassment
  • credibility
  • course of conduct

Claim Types

Cited Laws and Legal Issues

Employment Rights Act 1996 section 13Employment Rights Act 1996

ld the claimant’s complaints of sexual harassment and unlawful deductions from wages. The wages claim is not the subject of this present a

Equality Act 2010 sex / pregnancy discriminationEquality Act 2010

The claimant succeeded in her claims of sexual harassment against the first respondent, who was a director and ow

Decision Text

Judgment approved by the Court R Vikal & Emma Victoria Ltd t-a Shapins Clinic v A Freke © EAT 2026 Page 1 [2025] EAT 206 Neutral Citation Number: [2025] EAT 206 Case No: EA-2023-001494-OO EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL Rolls Building Fetter Lane, London, EC4A 1NL Date: 25 November 2025 Before : THE HON. LORD FAIRLEY, PRESIDENT - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Between : (1) ROHIT VIKAL (2) EMMA VICTORIA LIMITED (t/a SHAPINS CLINIC) Appellants - and - MISS APRIL FREKE Respondent - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr Rafael Katz (instructed by Peninsula) for the Appellants Miss April Freke the Respondent in person Hearing date: 25 November 2025 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - JUDGMENT Judgment approved by the Court R Vikal & Emma Victoria Ltd t-a Shapins Clinic v A Freke © EAT 2026 Page 2 [2025] EAT 206 SUMMARY Sex discrimination; sexual harassment; evidence; Tribunal accepting claimant’s uncontradicted account of harassment The claimant was employed by the second respondent. She made a complaint of sexual harassment. Her complaint involved alleged conduct of the first respondent in his capacity as a director and owner of her employer, the second respondent. The Tribunal heard evidence and found that eight incidents of sexual harassment had been established. It concluded that the incidents formed a course of conduct by the first respondent. The respondents appealed, contending only that the Tribunal should not have accepted that one of the eight incidents had happened. They submitted that in light of Tui UK Limited v. Griffiths [2023] UKSC 48, the Tribunal had erred by impermissibly accepting the evidence of the claimant in relation to that one incident. It was also submitted that, in accepting the claimant as credible and reliable in relation to that single incident, the Tribunal had i...

Download full PDF

Compensation

Total£19,305
* Estimated figure
Compensatory£2,305
Injury to Feelings£17,000

Employer

Respondent

Miss April Freke

Employer page →View all cases →

Case Details

Case Number
[2025] EAT 206
Tribunal
Employment Appeal Tribunal
Level
Appeal
Decision Date
25/11/2026
Published
03/03/2026
Jurisdiction
England & Wales
Judge
Employment Judge THE HON. LORD FAIRLEY, PRESIDENT