Miss April Freke
Case Summary
The claimant succeeded in her claims of sexual harassment against the first respondent, who was a director and owner of the second respondent employer. The tribunal accepted the claimant's uncontradicted evidence in relation to one of the eight incidents of harassment, and considered the totality of the course of conduct in assessing the claimant's credibility.
Key Issues
- •sexual harassment
- •credibility
- •course of conduct
Claim Types
Cited Laws and Legal Issues
ld the claimant’s complaints of sexual harassment and unlawful deductions from wages. The wages claim is not the subject of this present a
The claimant succeeded in her claims of sexual harassment against the first respondent, who was a director and ow
Decision Text
Judgment approved by the Court R Vikal & Emma Victoria Ltd t-a Shapins Clinic v A Freke © EAT 2026 Page 1 [2025] EAT 206 Neutral Citation Number: [2025] EAT 206 Case No: EA-2023-001494-OO EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL Rolls Building Fetter Lane, London, EC4A 1NL Date: 25 November 2025 Before : THE HON. LORD FAIRLEY, PRESIDENT - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Between : (1) ROHIT VIKAL (2) EMMA VICTORIA LIMITED (t/a SHAPINS CLINIC) Appellants - and - MISS APRIL FREKE Respondent - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr Rafael Katz (instructed by Peninsula) for the Appellants Miss April Freke the Respondent in person Hearing date: 25 November 2025 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - JUDGMENT Judgment approved by the Court R Vikal & Emma Victoria Ltd t-a Shapins Clinic v A Freke © EAT 2026 Page 2 [2025] EAT 206 SUMMARY Sex discrimination; sexual harassment; evidence; Tribunal accepting claimant’s uncontradicted account of harassment The claimant was employed by the second respondent. She made a complaint of sexual harassment. Her complaint involved alleged conduct of the first respondent in his capacity as a director and owner of her employer, the second respondent. The Tribunal heard evidence and found that eight incidents of sexual harassment had been established. It concluded that the incidents formed a course of conduct by the first respondent. The respondents appealed, contending only that the Tribunal should not have accepted that one of the eight incidents had happened. They submitted that in light of Tui UK Limited v. Griffiths [2023] UKSC 48, the Tribunal had erred by impermissibly accepting the evidence of the claimant in relation to that one incident. It was also submitted that, in accepting the claimant as credible and reliable in relation to that single incident, the Tribunal had i...
Compensation
Employer
Case Details
- Case Number
- [2025] EAT 206
- Tribunal
- Employment Appeal Tribunal
- Level
- Appeal
- Decision Date
- 25/11/2026
- Published
- 03/03/2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge THE HON. LORD FAIRLEY, PRESIDENT