Ocado Central Services Ltd
Case Summary
The Claimant appealed against the decision of an Employment Judge: (1) refusing to recuse himself on the grounds of apparent bias; (2) striking out the Claimant's claim against the Respondent under s.15(1) of the Equality Act 2010 concerning the Claimant's start date and the Respondent's recruitment process on the grounds that it was presented out of time and holding that it was not just and equitable to extend time; (3) finding that during the relevant period, 6 April – 5 April 2022, the Claimant was not disabled under s.6 of the Equality Act 2010 because of depression; (4) dismissing the remaining claim of disability discrimination.
Key Issues
- •practice and procedure – allegations of apparent bias
- •disability discrimination
- •time limits and the just and equitable extension of time
Claim Types
Cited Laws and Legal Issues
se of depression; (4) dismissing the remaining claim of disability discrimination.
al; (2) a claim for disability discrimination; (3) a holiday pay claim; and (4) a wages claim. By its ET3 and Response,
Decision Text
Judgment approved by the Court Leonard-Elmaz v Ocado Central Services Ltd © EAT 2026 Page 1 [2026] EAT 41 Neutral Citation Number: [2026] EAT 41 Case No: EA-2024-000034-NK EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL Rolls Building Fetter Lane, London, EC4A 1NL Date: 15 January 2026 Before: ANDREW HOCHHAUSER KC DEPUTY JUDGE OF THE HIGH COURT - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Between: MR D LEONARD-ELMAZ Appellant - and – OCADO CENTRAL SERVICES LTD Respondent - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr Denys Leonard-Elmaz the Appellant appeared in Person Ms Jude Shepherd (instructed by Ashfords LLP) for the Respondent Hearing date: 15 January 2026 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - JUDGMENT Judgment approved by the Court Leonard-Elmaz v Ocado Central Services Ltd © EAT 2026 Page 2 [2026] EAT 41 SUMMARY practice and procedure – allegations of apparent bias disability discrimination time limits and the just and equitable extension of time The Claimant appealed against the decision of an Employment Judge: (1) refusing to recuse himself on the grounds of apparent bias; (2) striking out the Claimant’s claim against the Respondent under s.15(1) of the Equality Act 2010 concerning the Claimant’s start date and the Respondent’s recruitment process (the “Start Date/Recruitment Claim”) on the grounds that it was presented out of time and holding that...
Employer
Case Details
- Case Number
- [2026] EAT 41
- Tribunal
- Employment Appeal Tribunal
- Level
- Appeal
- Decision Date
- 15/01/2026
- Published
- 01/04/2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tinnion