Moss Bros Group Ltd
Case Summary
The claimant was dismissed in 2019 and brought claims of unfair dismissal and various forms of discrimination against the respondent retailer. The progress of the claims was delayed by the Covid-19 pandemic and the respondent's CVA process. At a preliminary hearing in 2023, the tribunal struck out the discrimination claims as no longer capable of a fair trial due to the unavailability of key witnesses. The claimant appealed this decision. The respondent's applications to postpone the full merits hearing of the remaining claims were refused.
Key Issues
- •strike out of discrimination claims
- •postponement of full merits hearing
Claim Types
Cited Laws and Legal Issues
he claimant was dismissed in 2019 and brought claims of unfair dismissal and various forms of discrimination against the respond
ace and religion, a complaint of unfair dismissal and a holiday pay claim. The claimant appeals from (a) a decision taken
Decision Text
Judgment approved by the court for handing down Boateng v Moss Bros Group Limited © EAT 2026 Page 1 [2026] EAT 50 Neutral Citation Number: [2026] EAT 50 Case No: EA-2023-001458-NK EA-2024-000786-NK EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL Rolls Building Fetter Lane, London, EC4A 1NL Date: 2 April 2026 Before: HIS HONOUR JUDGE AUERBACH - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Between: ANTHONY BOATENG Appellant - and – MOSS BROS GROUP LIMITED Respondent - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Daniel Hallström (instructed via the Free Representation Unit) for the Appellant Paul Smith (instructed by Gordons LLP) for the Respondent Hearing date: 3 February 2026 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - JUDGMENT Judgment approved by the court for handing down Boateng v Moss Bros Group Limited © EAT 2026 Page 2 [2026] EAT 50 SUMMARY PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE Strike out; Postponement The claimant was dismissed in 2019. In 2020 he began a claim including multiple complaints of discrimination during employment going back to 2017, and unfair dismissal. Progress of the tribunal litigation was substantially delayed by the Covid-19 pandemic and a period during which the respondent was subject to a CVA. At a preliminary hearing in 2023 the tribunal struck out the discrimination complaints on the basis that they were no longer capable of a fair trial. In the particular circumstances of this case the tribunal did not err in doing so. This decision considers how a tribunal should approach the “fair trial” issue in th...
Employer
Case Details
- Case Number
- [2026] EAT 50
- Tribunal
- Employment Appeal Tribunal
- Level
- Appeal
- Decision Date
- 02/04/2026
- Published
- 02/04/2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge His Honour Judge Auerbach