Decision date
17 April 2026
Tribunal
Employment Appeal Tribunal
Jurisdiction
England & Wales
Judge
The Honourable Lord Colbeck
Case Summary
This EAT appeal concerns John the claimant, who was appointed as lead junior counsel to the Scottish Child Abuse Inquiry (SCAI) and brought claims for disability discrimination and victimisation. The ET dismissed the claims on jurisdiction grounds, holding that the claimant was neither a public office holder under section 50(2)(b) of the Equality Act 2010 nor a 'worker' under employment law. The EAT upheld the ET's decision, confirming that counsel to a public inquiry operates as a self-employed advocate without the status necessary to bring discrimination claims under Part 5 of the Equality Act 2010.
Why this outcome?
Jurisdictional barThe EAT upheld the Employment Tribunal's dismissal because counsel to a public inquiry, although appointed to the SCAI, was not holder of a public office within section 50(2)(b) of the Equality Act 2010 (which requires appointment to an office made on recommendation or with approval of a member of the executive). The appellant also failed to meet the definition of 'worker' because he was a self-employed advocate providing professional services to a client without the necessary subordination relationship, meaning he fell outside the jurisdictional scope of Part 5 of the Equality Act 2010 discrimination protections.
Claim Types
Related claim guides
Use these claim-type pages to compare this decision with other published tribunal cases, outcome patterns, and visible award data.
See disability discrimination compensation dataKey Issues
- •Whether counsel to a public inquiry established under the Inquiries Act 2005 is the holder of a public office within section 50(2)(b) of the Equality Act 2010
- •Whether counsel to a public inquiry is a 'worker' within section 230(3)(b) of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- •Whether the Employment Tribunal has jurisdiction to hear claims of disability discrimination and victimisation
- •Whether the appellant was a self-employed advocate or held employment status entitling him to discrimination protections
- •Procedural issue: whether the appellant agreed to determination by written submissions without further evidence
Original published judgment
The full source document is available from the official publication page.
Something doesn't look right?
Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.
Case Details
Hearing venue
Decided at Edinburgh Employment Tribunal →- Case No.
- [2026] EAT 56
- Appeal
- Appeal partly allowed
- Tribunal
- Employment Appeal Tribunal
- Level
- Appeal
- Decision
- 17 April 2026
- Published
- 22 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- The Honourable Lord Colbeck
- Representation
- Litigant in person