Decision date
20 March 2025
Tribunal
Employment Tribunal
Jurisdiction
England & Wales
Judge
Employment Judge Edmonds, Dr G Hammersley, Mr R Virdee
Case Summary
The Employment Tribunal found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed and succeeded in his claims of being subjected to detriment for making protected disclosures, but failed in his claim of direct sex discrimination. The tribunal also identified issues with the respondent's handling of the investigation and suspension process.
Why this outcome?
The tribunal found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed and succeeded in his protected disclosure claims, but failed in his sex discrimination claim; the respondent was ultimately unsuccessful on the balance of the claims brought.
Claim Types
Related claim guides
Use these claim-type pages to compare this decision with other published tribunal cases, outcome patterns, and visible award data.
See unfair dismissal compensation dataKey Issues
- •unfair dismissal
- •automatic unfair dismissal
- •detriment for making protected disclosures
- •direct sex discrimination
Original published judgment
The full source document is available from the official publication page.
Something doesn't look right?
Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.
Case Details
Hearing venue
Decided at Birmingham Employment Tribunal →- Case No.
- 1301370/2022
- Tribunal
- Employment Tribunal
- Level
- First instance
- Decision
- 20 March 2025
- Published
- 2 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Edmonds, Dr G Hammersley, Mr R Virdee
- Representation
- Legally represented