OP Mobility Exterior UK Ltd (Formerly Plastic Omnium Automotive Ltd)

Case Summary

The tribunal found the claimant was unfairly dismissed by OP Mobility Exterior UK Limited, but rejected claims of automatically unfair dismissal on whistleblowing grounds and race discrimination. The tribunal determined there was a 75% chance the claimant would have been fairly dismissed in any event. The complaint regarding holiday pay was upheld, finding an unauthorised deduction of 3 days of accrued holiday pay.

The claimant was unfairly dismissed because the tribunal found the dismissal process was flawed, though there was a 75% chance he would have been fairly dismissed if proper procedures had been followed. The claims of automatically unfair dismissal on whistleblowing grounds and race discrimination were rejected as not well founded. The holiday pay complaint was upheld as an unauthorised deduction.

Use these claim-type pages to compare this decision with other published tribunal cases, outcome patterns, and visible award data.

• •Automatically unfair dismissal on grounds of protected disclosure (section 103A ERA)
• •Detriment on grounds of protected disclosure (sections 47B and 48 ERA)
• •Unfair dismissal (section 94 ERA)
• •Direct race discrimination (section 13 EQA)
• •Wrongful dismissal
• •Unauthorised deductions from pay (Part II ERA)
• •Holiday pay deduction
• •Victimisation (section 27 EQA)

The full source document is available from the official publication page.