Birmingham City Council

Case Summary

The case involved a claimant's complaint that his employer, Birmingham City Council, stopped providing him with private medical insurance in July 2023. The tribunal determined that there was no implied agreement by the claimant to lose his private medical insurance and found against the respondent.

The tribunal found that there was no implied agreement by the claimant to lose his private medical insurance, and determined the claim against the respondent; however, the case was settled.

Use the matching calculator page to compare this decision with published award patterns.

• •prima facie variation of the claimant’s employment contract and, if so, did the variation mean that he was no longer contractually entitled to private medical insurance?
• •was the variation rendered void by the operation of regulation 4 of the Transfer of Undertakings Regulations (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 (‘TUPE’)?

The full source document is available from the official publication page.