Decision date
1 April 2026
Tribunal
Employment Tribunal
Jurisdiction
England & Wales
Judge
Employment Judge Lumby
Case Summary
The claimant brought claims against the respondent but the tribunal determined that he was not an employee and/or worker at the relevant time. As the claimant did not have the requisite employment status, the tribunal lacked jurisdiction to determine the claims and dismissed them accordingly.
Why this outcome?
No employee/worker statusThe tribunal found that the claimant was not an employee and/or worker of the respondent at the relevant time, meaning the tribunal lacked jurisdiction to hear the claims.
Claim Types
Related claim guides
Use these claim-type pages to compare this decision with other published tribunal cases, outcome patterns, and visible award data.
See breach of contract compensation dataKey Issues
- •Employment status
- •Whether claimant was an employee and/or worker
Original published judgment
The full source document is available from the official publication page.
Something doesn't look right?
Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.
Case Details
Hearing venue
Decided at Southampton Employment Tribunal →- Case No.
- 1400525/2025
- Tribunal
- Employment Tribunal
- Level
- First instance
- Decision
- 1 April 2026
- Published
- 13 May 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lumby
- Representation
- Litigant in person
Registered Company
- Company name
- ARC HD SERVICES LIMITED
- Company number
- 07256314
- Industry
- Healthcare & Social Care
- Status
- active