Decision date
19 January 2026
Tribunal
Employment Tribunal
Jurisdiction
England & Wales
Judge
Employment Judge C H O'Rourke
Case Summary
The claimant, a trainee pilot, brought claims of sex discrimination and harassment against her trainer, Mr Pearson, who was employed by Babcock International Group plc under contract with the respondent MOD. The MOD applied to strike out the claims against Mr Pearson on the basis that it could not be held vicariously liable for his acts as he was not an employee or agent of the MOD.
Why this outcome?
Jurisdictional barThe MOD cannot be held vicariously liable for Mr Pearson's alleged discriminatory acts because he was not an employee or agent of the MOD; he was employed by Babcock International Group plc under a separate contract.
Claim Types
Key Issues
- •whether the respondent MOD is vicariously liable under s.109 of the Equality Act 2010 for the alleged acts of discrimination and harassment by the trainer, Mr Pearson
Original published judgment
The full source document is available from the official publication page.
Something doesn't look right?
Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.
Case Details
Hearing venue
Decided at Bristol Employment Tribunal →- Case No.
- 1404289/2023
- Tribunal
- Employment Tribunal
- Level
- First instance
- Decision
- 19 January 2026
- Published
- 26 March 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge C H O'Rourke
- Representation
- Litigant in person