1404289/2023Struck out

Ministry of Defence

19 January 2026·Employment Tribunal·England & Wales·Employment Judge C H O'Rourke

Respondent

Ministry of Defence

All cases →

Decision date

19 January 2026

Tribunal

Employment Tribunal

Jurisdiction

England & Wales

Judge

Employment Judge C H O'Rourke

Case Summary

The claimant, a trainee pilot, brought claims of sex discrimination and harassment against her trainer, Mr Pearson, who was employed by Babcock International Group plc under contract with the respondent MOD. The MOD applied to strike out the claims against Mr Pearson on the basis that it could not be held vicariously liable for his acts as he was not an employee or agent of the MOD.

Why this outcome?

Jurisdictional bar

The MOD cannot be held vicariously liable for Mr Pearson's alleged discriminatory acts because he was not an employee or agent of the MOD; he was employed by Babcock International Group plc under a separate contract.

Claim Types

Sex DiscriminationHarassment

Key Issues

  • whether the respondent MOD is vicariously liable under s.109 of the Equality Act 2010 for the alleged acts of discrimination and harassment by the trainer, Mr Pearson

Original published judgment

The full source document is available from the official publication page.

Something doesn't look right?

Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.