1406039/2023Respondent won

G

30 April 2026·Employment Tribunal·England & Wales·Employment Judge Self

Respondent

G

All cases →

Decision date

30 April 2026

Tribunal

Employment Tribunal

Jurisdiction

England & Wales

Judge

Employment Judge Self

Case Summary

The claimant, representing herself, brought claims for victimisation, harassment related to sex, and direct sex discrimination against the respondent. The tribunal found that the victimisation claim and most harassment allegations were not well-founded and were dismissed, except for one specific harassment allegation (1.1.1.1) which was upheld. All direct sex discrimination claims were dismissed.

Why this outcome?

Claim not well-founded

The tribunal found that the victimisation claim and most harassment allegations were not well-founded based on the evidence presented. However, one specific harassment allegation (1.1.1.1) was found to be well-founded, resulting in an award of £4,000 for injury to feelings plus statutory interest.

Claim Types

HarassmentDiscrimination SexVictimisation

Related calculator

Use the matching calculator page to compare this decision with published award patterns.

See sex discrimination compensation data

Key Issues

  • Victimisation claim
  • Harassment related to sex
  • Direct sex discrimination

Original published judgment

The full source document is available from the official publication page.

Something doesn't look right?

Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.