Decision date
30 April 2026
Tribunal
Employment Tribunal
Jurisdiction
England & Wales
Judge
Employment Judge Self
Case Summary
The claimant, representing herself, brought claims for victimisation, harassment related to sex, and direct sex discrimination against the respondent. The tribunal found that the victimisation claim and most harassment allegations were not well-founded and were dismissed, except for one specific harassment allegation (1.1.1.1) which was upheld. All direct sex discrimination claims were dismissed.
Why this outcome?
Claim not well-foundedThe tribunal found that the victimisation claim and most harassment allegations were not well-founded based on the evidence presented. However, one specific harassment allegation (1.1.1.1) was found to be well-founded, resulting in an award of £4,000 for injury to feelings plus statutory interest.
Claim Types
Related calculator
Use the matching calculator page to compare this decision with published award patterns.
See sex discrimination compensation dataKey Issues
- •Victimisation claim
- •Harassment related to sex
- •Direct sex discrimination
Original published judgment
The full source document is available from the official publication page.
Something doesn't look right?
Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.
Case Details
Hearing venue
Decided at Southampton Employment Tribunal →- Case No.
- 1406039/2023
- Tribunal
- Employment Tribunal
- Level
- First instance
- Decision
- 30 April 2026
- Published
- 11 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Self