University of East Anglia

Case Summary

The claimant challenged her dismissal, arguing it was discriminatory and an act of victimisation. The tribunal found the dismissal to be unfair but not discriminatory.

The tribunal found that while the dismissal was unfair, it was not discriminatory or an act of victimization, as the claimant's discrimination and victimization claims lacked the necessary causal link to protected characteristics.

Use these claim-type pages to compare this decision with other published tribunal cases, outcome patterns, and visible award data.

• •reason for dismissal
• •discrimination

The full source document is available from the official publication page.