Health Education England

Case Summary

The claimant's claims of public interest disclosure detriment were dismissed. The judge found no logical connection between the decision to remove the claimant from night shifts and her protected disclosure, and considered the criticisms before and after the disclosure as inconsistent with a motive related to the disclosure.

The tribunal found no causal connection between the claimant's protected disclosure and the employer's decision to remove her from night shifts, and noted that the employer's criticisms of the claimant were inconsistent with a retaliatory motive related to the disclosure.

Use the matching calculator page to compare this decision with published award patterns.

• •Did C make a protected disclosure for the purposes of s 43A?
• •Was C subjected to a detriment done on the ground that C had made a protected disclosure?

The full source document is available from the official publication page.