Decision date
19 December 2025
Tribunal
Employment Tribunal
Jurisdiction
England & Wales
Judge
Employment Judge Goodman
Case Summary
The claimant's application for interim relief following his dismissal on 4 October 2020 is refused. The claimant says the dismissal was unfair because he was dismissed for making protected public interest disclosures (whistleblowing), or because he had carried out health and safety activities when designated for those duties. The respondent says he was dismissed by reason of redundancy.
Claim Types
Related claim guides
Use these claim-type pages to compare this decision with other published tribunal cases, outcome patterns, and visible award data.
See unfair dismissal compensation dataKey Issues
- •protected public interest disclosures (whistleblowing)
- •health and safety activities
Original published judgment
The full source document is available from the official publication page.
Something doesn't look right?
Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.
Case Details
Hearing venue
Decided at London Central Employment Tribunal →- Case No.
- 2206663/2020
- Tribunal
- Employment Tribunal
- Level
- First instance
- Decision
- 19 December 2025
- Published
- 28 January 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Goodman
- Representation
- Litigant in person
Registered Company
- Company name
- HARRODS LIMITED
- Company number
- 00030209
- Industry
- Retail & Wholesale
- Status
- active