Decision date
7 November 2024
Tribunal
Employment Tribunal
Jurisdiction
England & Wales
Judge
Employment Judge Gidney
Case Summary
The Employment Tribunal dismissed all of the Claimant’s claims, including ordinary unfair dismissal and automatic unfair dismissal for making a public interest disclosure.
Why this outcome?
Claim not well-foundedThe tribunal dismissed all of the claimant's claims following a full hearing, finding them not well-founded on their merits, including the claims for ordinary unfair dismissal and automatic unfair dismissal for making a public interest disclosure.
Claim Types
Related claim guides
Use these claim-type pages to compare this decision with other published tribunal cases, outcome patterns, and visible award data.
See unfair dismissal compensation dataKey Issues
- •Incident between Claimant and Evie on 13th June 2023
- •Grievance process initiated by Luxe Associates Ltd
- •Claimant's claims of unfair dismissal and public interest disclosure dismissed
Original published judgment
The full source document is available from the official publication page.
Something doesn't look right?
Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.
Case Details
Hearing venue
Decided at London Central Employment Tribunal →- Case No.
- 2216167/2023
- Tribunal
- Employment Tribunal
- Level
- First instance
- Decision
- 7 November 2024
- Published
- 3 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gidney
- Industry
- Technology
- Representation
- Litigant in person
Registered Company
- Company name
- HARRODS LIMITED
- Company number
- 00030209
- Industry
- Retail & Wholesale
- Status
- active