Decision date
9 February 2026
Tribunal
Employment Tribunal
Jurisdiction
England & Wales
Judge
Employment Judge Burge
Case Summary
The claimant's employment tribunal claims were struck out for failure to comply with tribunal orders and lack of active pursuit.
Why this outcome?
Non-compliance with ordersThe tribunal struck out the claim because the claimant failed to comply with tribunal orders and did not actively pursue the claim.
Claim Types
Related claim guides
Use these claim-type pages to compare this decision with other published tribunal cases, outcome patterns, and visible award data.
See unfair dismissal compensation dataKey Issues
- •time limits
- •protected disclosure detriment
- •direct race discrimination
- •direct sex discrimination
- •direct age discrimination
- •disability discrimination (direct, discrimination arising and a failure to make reasonable adjustments)
- •victimisation
- •unfair dismissal (ordinary and automatic)
- •notice pay
- •holiday pay
Original published judgment
The full source document is available from the official publication page.
Something doesn't look right?
Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.
Case Details
Hearing venue
Decided at London South Employment Tribunal →- Case No.
- 2303832/2024
- Tribunal
- Employment Tribunal
- Level
- First instance
- Decision
- 9 February 2026
- Published
- 11 March 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Burge
- Representation
- Litigant in person
Registered Company
- Company name
- LIDL GREAT BRITAIN LIMITED
- Company number
- 02816429
- Industry
- Retail & Wholesale
- Status
- active