2305407/2020Struck out

Oasis Community Learning and Oasis Academy Skinner Street

11 April 2026·Employment Tribunal·England & Wales·Employment Judge Andrews

Respondent

Oasis Community Learning and Oasis Academy Skinner Street

All cases →

Decision date

11 April 2026

Tribunal

Employment Tribunal

Jurisdiction

England & Wales

Judge

Employment Judge Andrews

Case Summary

The claimant's claim against Oasis Community Learning and Oasis Academy Skinner Street was struck out under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 because it had not been actively pursued. The claimant did not respond to the tribunal's warning letter dated 10 January 2026 and consequently the claim was struck out.

Why this outcome?

Not actively pursued

The claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued and the claimant failed to respond to a warning letter from the tribunal giving them an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out or to request a hearing.

Claim Types

Part-time-workersDiscrimination SexUnlawful DeductionWorking Time

Related calculator

Use the matching calculator page to compare this decision with published award patterns.

See sex discrimination compensation data

Key Issues

  • whether claim should be struck out for lack of active pursuit

Original published judgment

The full source document is available from the official publication page.

Something doesn't look right?

Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.