Nursery @ Aspire
Case Summary
The claimant's application to strike out the respondent's responses was dismissed.
Key Issues
- •application to strike out the respondent’s responses
Claim Types
Decision Text
Case Nos: 2305843/2023 & 2305584/2024 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Malgorzata Slyk Respondent: Nursery @ Aspire Heard at: Croydon by CVP On: 30 January 2025 Before: Employment Judge Liz Ord Tribunal Member Norina O’Hare Tribunal Member Christine Lloyd-Jennings Representation: Claimant: Michael Cairns (lay representative) Respondent: Lucy Evanson (counsel) JUDGMENT The claimant’s application to strike out the respondent’s responses is dismissed. Employment Judge Liz Ord Date: 31 st January 2025 JUDGMENT SENT TO THE PARTIES ON Date: 4 th February 2025 FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE Notes Case Nos: 2305843/2023 & 2305584/2024 1. Reasons for the judgment having been given orally at the hearing, written reasons will not be provided unless a request was made by either party at the hearing or a written request is presented by either party within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision. If written reasons are provided, they will be displayed on the tribunal’s online register of judgments, which is visible to internet searches.
Employer
Employment Details
- Industry
- Education
- Representation
- Legally represented
Case Details
- Case Number
- 2305843/2023
- Decision Date
- 12/07/2025
- Published
- 24/07/2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Liz Ord