Decision date
25 April 2026
Tribunal
Employment Tribunal
Jurisdiction
England & Wales
Judge
Employment Judge Andrews
Case Summary
The claimant's claim was struck out following a warning letter dated 18 February 2026 that gave the claimant the opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out or request a hearing. The claimant failed to respond to this warning, and the tribunal accordingly struck out the claim as it had not been actively pursued.
Why this outcome?
Not actively pursuedThe claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The tribunal issued a warning letter on 18 February 2026 giving the claimant an opportunity to respond, but the claimant failed to reply.
Claim Types
Related calculator
Use the matching calculator page to compare this decision with published award patterns.
See sex discrimination compensation dataKey Issues
- •Whether the claim should be struck out for want of prosecution under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Original published judgment
The full source document is available from the official publication page.
Something doesn't look right?
Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.
Case Details
- Case No.
- 2308474/2020
- Tribunal
- Employment Tribunal
- Level
- First instance
- Decision
- 25 April 2026
- Published
- 22 May 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Andrews