Decision date
24 June 2024
Tribunal
Employment Tribunal
Jurisdiction
England & Wales
Judge
Dennehy
Case Summary
The respondent’s application for strike out and/or deposit orders in relation to the claim for automatic unfair dismissal and unfair dismissal was dismissed. The case will proceed to a full merits hearing.
Why this outcome?
The tribunal rejected the respondent's application to strike out the claims or impose deposit orders, finding that the claimant's claims for automatic unfair dismissal and unfair dismissal had sufficient merit to proceed to a full hearing.
Claim Types
Related claim guides
Use these claim-type pages to compare this decision with other published tribunal cases, outcome patterns, and visible award data.
See whistleblowing compensation dataKey Issues
- •repeated investigations, the lack of investigations of the claimants’ allegations of mistreatment and collusion of her colleagues
- •whether the claimant had made a protected disclosure
- •different version of events of an exchange between the claimant and the consultant anaesthetist
- •handling of the disciplinary and appeal hearing
- •accuracy of the disciplinary hearing minutes
Original published judgment
The full source document is available from the official publication page.
Something doesn't look right?
Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.
Case Details
Hearing venue
Decided at Manchester Employment Tribunal →- Case No.
- 2403393/2023
- Tribunal
- Employment Tribunal
- Level
- First instance
- Decision
- 24 June 2024
- Published
- 12 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Dennehy