Decision date
5 November 2025
Tribunal
Employment Tribunal
Jurisdiction
England & Wales
Judge
McDonald
Compensation awarded
£90,912
Extracted from judgment text — may not capture every award component precisely.
Case Summary
The claimant was unfairly dismissed and the respondent failed to comply with ACAS Code. The claims of harassment, unfavourable treatment due to disability, and victimisation were not well-founded.
Why this outcome?
The claimant's claims of harassment, unfavourable treatment due to disability, and victimisation were rejected on their merits at full hearing, whilst the unfair dismissal claim succeeded but the respondent's non-compliance with the ACAS Code did not result in the claim being upheld.
Claim Types
Related guide
Unfair dismissal cases won in the UK
Compare this judgment with other successful unfair dismissal cases and controlled win reasons.
Related claim guides
Use these claim-type pages to compare this decision with other published tribunal cases, outcome patterns, and visible award data.
Key Issues
- •Unfair dismissal
- •Disability discrimination (harassment, unfavourable treatment, victimisation)
Original published judgment
The full source document is available from the official publication page.
Something doesn't look right?
Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.
Case Details
Hearing venue
Decided at Manchester Employment Tribunal →- Case No.
- 2411199/2021
- Tribunal
- Employment Tribunal
- Level
- First instance
- Decision
- 5 November 2025
- Published
- 5 December 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- McDonald
- Representation
- Legally represented