St Helens Council
Case Summary
The claim was struck out as the Tribunal considered it had not been actively pursued.
Key Issues
- •claim had not been actively pursued
Claim Types
Decision Text
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Ms B Allcock Respondent: St Helens Council JUDGMENT The claim is struck out. REASONS 1. The Tribunal wrote to the claimant on 30 October 2025 warning them that the Tribunal was considering striking out the claim. This was because it appeared to the Tribunal, applying Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024, that the claim had not been actively pursued. 2. The letter gave the claimant an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out, or to request a hearing at which to do so. The claimant has not replied. 3. I am satisfied that the grounds for striking out the claim under Rule 38 apply, and that it would be in accordance with the overriding objective in Rule 3 to strike out the claim. This is because the claim had not been actively pursued. 4. The claim is therefore struck out. Approved by: Employment Judge M Butler 28 November 2025 JUDGMENT SENT TO THE PARTIES ON 3 December 2025 ..................................................................... ..................................................................... FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE
Employer
Employment Details
- Industry
- Public Sector / Government
Case Details
- Case Number
- 2418893/2020
- Decision Date
- 28/11/2025
- Published
- 07/01/2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Butler