Decision date
6 March 2025
Tribunal
Employment Tribunal
Jurisdiction
England & Wales
Judge
Employment Judge Hutchinson
Case Summary
The Employment Tribunal dismissed the claimant's claims of disability discrimination against the Ministry of Defence, finding that the Respondents did not provide necessary auxiliary aids and that the Claimant was not at a substantial disadvantage compared with those not suffering from her disability.
Why this outcome?
The tribunal found that the respondents did not provide necessary auxiliary aids, and the claimant was not at a substantial disadvantage compared with non-disabled persons, resulting in dismissal of the disability discrimination claims.
Claim Types
Key Issues
- •whether the claimant was put at a substantial disadvantage compared to someone without her disability in that she could not complete an assessment fully and that it increased the likelihood of her experiencing pain when performing desk bound tasks in her day to day role at RAF Waddington
- •whether the respondents knew or ought to have known the claimant was likely to be put at a substantial disadvantage
- •whether the respondents failed in their duty to take such steps as it would have been reasonable to have taken to avoid the disadvantage namely providing the auxiliary aids referred to above
Original published judgment
The full source document is available from the official publication page.
Something doesn't look right?
Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.
Case Details
Hearing venue
Decided at Lincoln Employment Tribunal →- Case No.
- 2600319/2024
- Tribunal
- Employment Tribunal
- Level
- First instance
- Decision
- 6 March 2025
- Published
- 24 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hutchinson
- Industry
- Public Sector / Government
- Representation
- Legally represented