Decision date
15 May 2026
Tribunal
Employment Tribunal
Jurisdiction
England & Wales
Judge
Employment Judge Anstis
Case Summary
The claimant was employed as Site Manager at Langford Village Community Primary School from July to December 2023. He brought claims for whistleblowing detriment, alleging he was subjected to unlawful detriments following protected disclosures regarding fire safety and health and safety compliance. The tribunal found the claimant was subject to unlawful detriments in the form of two unsatisfactory/negative references provided because of his protected disclosures.
Why this outcome?
One claim dismissed on the meritsThe tribunal found the claimant made qualifying protected disclosures under section 43B of the Employment Rights Act 1996 regarding fire safety and health and safety compliance at the school, and that he suffered unlawful detriments in the form of two unsatisfactory/negative references as a result of those disclosures.
Claim Types
Related claim guides
Use these claim-type pages to compare this decision with other published tribunal cases, outcome patterns, and visible award data.
See whistleblowing compensation dataKey Issues
- •Whether the claimant made qualifying protected disclosures under section 43B Employment Rights Act 1996
- •Whether the claimant was subject to unlawful detriments because of protected disclosures
- •Whether the provision of two unsatisfactory/negative references constituted unlawful detriment
- •Vicarious liability of the first respondent
Original published judgment
The full source document is available from the official publication page.
Something doesn't look right?
Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.
Case Details
Hearing venue
Decided at Reading Employment Tribunal →- Case No.
- 3301251/2024
- Tribunal
- Employment Tribunal
- Level
- First instance
- Decision
- 15 May 2026
- Published
- 11 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
- Industry
- Education
- Representation
- Legally represented