3301519/2024Partial success

Royal Mail Group Ltd

27 April 2026·Employment Tribunal·England & Wales·Employment Judge Alliott

Respondent

Royal Mail Group Ltd

All cases →

Decision date

27 April 2026

Tribunal

Employment Tribunal

Jurisdiction

England & Wales

Judge

Employment Judge Alliott

Case Summary

The claimant, employed by Royal Mail Group Ltd since 24 January 2005, was summarily dismissed on 25 October 2023 for alleged misconduct. The tribunal found the claimant was unfairly and wrongfully dismissed, but dismissed his disability and religion/belief discrimination claims. The tribunal found the claimant was not blameless and reduced awards by one third due to his contribution to the dismissal.

Why this outcome?

One claim dismissed on the merits

The tribunal found that whilst the respondent identified a potentially fair reason for dismissal (conduct), it failed to follow fair procedure by dismissing the claimant summarily without a disciplinary hearing when the claimant was sick, and a decision to dismiss for misconduct would have been outside the range of reasonable responses. The discrimination claims failed on the facts; the claimant was not disabled and the religion/belief claims were dismissed on time limit grounds.

Claim Types

Unfair DismissalWrongful DismissalBreach Of Contract

Related guide

Unfair dismissal cases won in the UK

Compare this judgment with other successful unfair dismissal cases and controlled win reasons.

Open examples

Related claim guides

Use these claim-type pages to compare this decision with other published tribunal cases, outcome patterns, and visible award data.

See unfair dismissal compensation data

Key Issues

  • Whether the claimant was dismissed for a potentially fair reason (conduct)
  • Whether the respondent acted reasonably in treating conduct as sufficient reason for dismissal
  • Whether fair procedure was followed in the disciplinary process
  • Whether the claimant was disabled within the meaning of the Equality Act
  • Whether the claimant was discriminated against on grounds of religion or belief
  • Whether the claimant was entitled to payment in lieu of notice
  • Contribution and reduction for claimant's blameworthy conduct

Original published judgment

The full source document is available from the official publication page.

Something doesn't look right?

Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.