Decision date
8 January 2024
Tribunal
Employment Tribunal
Jurisdiction
England & Wales
Judge
Shastri-Hurst
Case Summary
The claims under s145B of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 were dismissed as the claimants failed to establish a real possibility that the terms would have been determined by collective agreement if not for the individual offers.
Why this outcome?
Claim not well-foundedThe claimants failed to establish the necessary legal threshold for their claims under s145B of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, specifically that there was a real possibility the terms would have been determined by collective agreement absent the individual offers.
Claim Types
Related calculator
Use the matching calculator page to compare this decision with published award patterns.
See unpaid wages compensation dataKey Issues
- •Misunderstanding of the collective bargaining process
- •GMB's intention to ballot for strike action
Original published judgment
The full source document is available from the official publication page.
Something doesn't look right?
Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.
Case Details
Hearing venue
Decided at Reading Employment Tribunal →- Case No.
- 3306831/2021
- Tribunal
- Employment Tribunal
- Level
- First instance
- Decision
- 8 January 2024
- Published
- 19 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Shastri-Hurst
- Representation
- Legally represented
Registered Company
- Company name
- BRITISH GAS SERVICES LIMITED
- Company number
- 03141243
- Industry
- Other Services
- Status
- active