The London Borough of Haringey

. 1 THE EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Miss E Allbright Respondent: The London Borough of Haringey On: 12 November 2025 Heard at: Norwich (by CVP) Before: Employment Judge M Warren Representation For the Claimant: Mr A Effiong, Tribunal Advocate For the Respondent: Ms C Jennings, Counsel CASE MANAGEMENT PRELIMINARY HEARING (PUBLIC) SUMMARY JUDGMENT 1. The Claimant’s application to amend her claim in so far as the amendments are set out in the List of Issues agreed today, is granted. 2. The Claimant’s application to amend her claim to include additional complaints of harassment related to disability and victimisation is refused. 3. The Respondent’s application for a Deposit Order is refused. REASONS Background 1. Miss Allbright remains in the employment of the Respondent as a Housing Officer and has been so employed since 2007. She issued these proceedings on 4 November 2024. The case came before Employment Judge Young at a Case Management Preliminary Hearing on 3 October . 2 2025. EJ Young identified the issues in the case and then set up this Public Preliminary Hearing in order to: 1.1. Consider any application to amend; 1.2. Consider any application for a Deposit Order; 1.3. Consider any other applications which may be made; and 1.4. List the case for a Dispute Resolution Appointment. Papers before me today 2. For today’s hearing, I have been provided with a Bundle from the Respondent’s solicitors for which I am grateful. Each party has provided an Agenda and Miss Allbright has provided an Income and Expenses Schedule in view of the anticipated application for a Deposit Order. 3. Miss Allbright has not hitherto had legal representation. After the last Preliminary Hearing, she consulted solicitors and so today, she has the benefit of legal repres...