Carlisle Support Services Group Ltd
Case Summary
All complaints of direct race and religious discrimination, as well as harassment related to these grounds, were dismissed.
Key Issues
- •direct race discrimination
- •direct religious discrimination
- •harassment related to race
- •harassment related to religion
Claim Types
Cited Laws and Legal Issues
solicitor) JUDGMENT 1. The complaint of direct race discrimination is not well-founded and is dismissed. 2. The compla
Decision Text
Case No: 3313490/2023 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr E Mughal Respondent: Carlisle Support Services Group Ltd Heard at: Watford On: 7 to 10 July 2025 Before: Employment Judge Dick Representation Claimant: In person Respondent: Mr R Katz (solicitor) JUDGMENT 1. The complaint of direct race discrimination is not well-founded and is dismissed. 2. The complaint of direct religious discrimination is not well-founded and is dismissed. 3. The complaint of harassment related to race is not well-founded and is dismissed. 4. The complaint of harassment related to religion is not well-founded and is dismissed. Approved by: Employment Judge Dick 19 July 2025 JUDGMENT SENT TO THE PARTIES ON 5 August 2025 FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE Case No: 3313490/2023 Notes Reasons for the judgment having been given orally at the hearing, written reasons will not be provided unless a request was made by either party at the hearing or a written request is presented by either party within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision. If written reasons are provided they will be placed online. All judgments (apart from judgments under Rule 51) and any written reasons for the judgments are published, in full, online at https://www.gov.uk/employment- tribunal-decisions shortly after a copy has been sent to the claimants and respondents. If a Tribunal hearing has been recorded, you may request a transcript of the recording. Unless there are exceptional circumstances, you will have to pay for it. If a transcript is produced it will not include any oral judgment or reasons given at the hearing. The transcript will not be checked, approved or verified by a judge. There is more information in the joint...
Employer
Employment Details
- Industry
- Professional Services
- Representation
- Litigant in person
Case Details
- Case Number
- 3313490/2023
- Decision Date
- 19/07/2025
- Published
- 15/10/2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dick