Back to search
3322927/2021unknown

Middlesex Learning Trust

13 July 2025England & WalesEmployment Judge Cowen
GOV.UK

Case Summary

Employment Judge Cowen found that Ms A Robinson was disabled due to back pain and migraines from March 2020 to August 2021. The judge did not award costs for the claimant's failure to provide clean copies of documents.

Key Issues

  • disability discrimination
  • failure to provide clean copies of documents

Claim Types

Cited Laws and Legal Issues

Equality Act 2010 disability discriminationEquality Act 2010

vant period. 46. The Claimant’s claims in respect of disability discrimination shall therefore be allowed to proceed. Costs 47. H

Decision Text

Case No 3322927/2021 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant Respondent v Ms A Robinson Middlesex Learning Trust Heard at: Watford (by CVP) On: 8 January 2024 Before: Employment Judge Cowen Appearances For the Claimant: Ms Robinson (in person) For the Respondent: Mr Starceric (counsel) RESERVED JUDGMENT 1. The Claimant was disabled by reason of back pain and migraines between March 2020 and 31 August 2021. 2. No order for costs will be made in relation to the Claimant’s failure to provide disclosure. REASONS Background 1. Apologies are provided to both parties with regard to the delay in providing this decision. 2. The purpose of the Preliminary Hearing was to consider whether the Claimant was disabled within s.6 Equality Act 2010 at the time of the alleged discriminatory acts. 3. A further issue emerged at the hearing with regard to the fact that the Claimant had been asked by the Respondent on 28 November 2023 and ordered by the Tribunal on 3 January 2024 to provide clean copies of the documents she relied upon. The Claimant had failed to do so. It transpired that the bundle for this hearing had been sent to the Claimant only 1 working day prior to the hearing, due to this problem with the documents. Case No 3322927/2021 4. Although he initially raised the issue of postponement, the Respondent’s counsel indicated that he was able to proceed with the hearing and did not therefore press for a postponement. The Tribunal indicated it was content to disregard any highlighting or comments on documents. The Respondent asserted that it would be proper to mark the Claimant’s actions by a costs order. 5. The postponement and costs applications were dealt with as a preliminary issue to the hearing. Submissions from both sides were heard. It was decided having taken into ac...

Download full PDF

Employer

Respondent

Middlesex Learning Trust

Employer page →View all cases →

Employment Details

Industry
Education
Representation
Litigant in person

Case Details

Case Number
3322927/2021
Decision Date
13/07/2025
Published
15/10/2025
Jurisdiction
England & Wales
Judge
Employment Judge Cowen