Fife Health Board and Dr B Upton

Case Summary

The claimant succeeded in a harassment claim but failed in other claims including direct and indirect discrimination, and victimisation. The first respondent was found to have harassed the claimant.

The tribunal found that the claimant's harassment claim was well-founded on the evidence presented, but the direct discrimination, indirect discrimination, and victimisation claims failed to meet the required legal tests.

Use these claim-type pages to compare this decision with other published tribunal cases, outcome patterns, and visible award data.

• •Harassment under section 26(1) of the Equality Act 2010
• •Direct discrimination contrary to section 13 of the Act
• •Indirect discrimination contrary to section 19 of the Act
• •Victimisation contrary to section 27 of the Act

The full source document is available from the official publication page.