National Wealth Fund Ltd

Case No. 6000815/2023 1 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr M Mahmood Respondent: National Wealth Fund Limited Heard at: Leeds On: 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 31 March 2025. 1 and 4 April 2025, 17 July 2025 (in chambers). 18 July 2025. Before: Employment Judge D N Jones Mr R Webb Ms GM Fleming REPRESENTATION: Claimant: Mr F Mortin, counsel Respondent: Mr M Humphrys, counsel JUDGMENT 1. By not progressing the request of the claimant for a pay review after 11 March 2022 the respondent subjected the claimant to a detriment which was an act of direct sex discrimination. 2. By not progressing the request of the claimant for a pay review after 27 June 2022 the respondent subjected the claimant to a detriment which was an act of victimisation. 3. By seeking immediately to terminate the contract of the claimant on 28 June 2022 the respondent subjected the claimant to a detriment which was an act of victimisation. 4. By making a decision not to extend the claimant’s contract from as early as 29 July 2022 (a decision which was subsequently reversed) the respondent subjected the claimant to a detriment which was an act of victimisation. 5. By providing the clamant with feedback which was factually incorrect on 21 October 2022, in an extract of an earlier email dated 18 August 2022, the respondent subjected the claimant to a detriment which was an act of victimisation. Case No. 6000815/2023 2 6. The above acts were conduct which extended over a period which ended more than 3 months before the complaint was presented to the Tribunal, but they were presented within such further period the Tribunal thinks was just and equitable. 7. By providing the claimant with feedback which was factually incorrect on 21 October 2022, in an extract of an earlier email dated 18 August 2022,...