DAPV Ltd

Case Summary

The claimant's claim against DAPV Limited was struck out under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. The Tribunal found that the claimant had failed to comply with a previous Order and had not actively pursued the claim, and the claimant did not respond to a warning letter or request a hearing.

The claim was struck out because the claimant failed to comply with an Order of the Tribunal dated 26 February 2025 and had not actively pursued the claim. The claimant did not respond to the Tribunal's warning letter or request a hearing to explain non-compliance.

Use the matching calculator page to compare this decision with published award patterns.

• •non-compliance with Tribunal Order dated 26 February 2025
• •failure to actively pursue claim

The full source document is available from the official publication page.