Newbold Solicitors
Case Summary
The claimant's unfair dismissal complaint was struck out due to insufficient employment duration.
Key Issues
- •two years service required for unfair dismissal complaint
Claim Types
Cited Laws and Legal Issues
The claimant's unfair dismissal complaint was struck out due to insufficient employment
Decision Text
each EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: D Arthur Respondent: Newbold Solicitors JUDGMENT The complaint that the claimant was unfairly dismissed is struck out. REASONS 1. The claimant complains of unfair dismissal. 2. Section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 requires a claimant to have not less than two years service to make an unfair dismissal complaint. 3. The claimant was employed by the respondent for less than two years. 4. Therefore the claimant is not entitled to bring such a complaint. 5. The claimant has failed to give an acceptable reason, despite being given the opportunity to do so, why the complaint should not be struck out. 6. Accordingly, the complaint of unfair dismissal is struck out. The claimant’s other complaints are not affected by this judgment. Approved by Employment Judge Sharp Date: 17 July 2025 JUDGMENT SENT TO THE PARTIES ON 04 September 2025 Kacey O’Brien FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE
Employer
Employment Details
- Industry
- Legal Services
Case Details
- Case Number
- 6016923/2025
- Decision Date
- 17/07/2025
- Published
- 09/09/2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sharp