E Osemwegie and Evago Global Capital Ltd
Case Summary
Claimant Soukaina Mgadri was awarded £31,700.26 in compensation for unpaid wages from her employment with Evago Global Capital Ltd.
Key Issues
- •Unpaid wages under s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- •Breach of the implied contractual duty to exercise reasonable skill and care
Claim Types
Cited Laws and Legal Issues
accordance with rule 35(2). 1. The complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages is well-founded and succeeds. 2. I make an ord
Decision Text
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: SOUKAINA MGADRI Respondent: (1) Evans Osemwegie and (2) Evago Global Capital Ltd Heard at: London Central Employment Tribunal On: 18/725 Before: Employment Judge Dowling Representation Claimant: Self-represented Respondent: did not attend and was not represented JUDGMENT The Tribunal judgment is as follows: 1. This is a claim for unpaid wages under s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996 brought by Soukaina Mgadri against 2 respondents (1) Evans Osemwegie and (2) Evago Global Capital Ltd. The respondents counter-claim for losses due to breach by the claimant of the implied contractual duty by to exercise reasonable skill and care. 2. This is the written decision following oral judgment delivered at the hearing. Preliminary matters 3. The case was listed for 3 hours for a final merits hearing on the 18th of July. That listing was made following a preliminary hearing on the 23rd of May, which itself had originally been listed for a full merits hearing. Judge Smith decided on that occasion that the full merits hearing could not go ahead as it was recognised that the claim may not have been received by the respondents and it was postponed to 18th July. The respondents did not attend the hearing on 23rd May and Judge smith expressed concern at paragraph (vi) of the note of the hearing that the respondents were not prepared to attend given that they were aware of the hearing. The postponed hearing was listed for the 18th of July, the respondents having failed to provide any dates to avoid in their request for a postponement. Case management orders were made on that day, including the date of the final merits hearing, and were emailed to the respondents. 4. The respondents were directed to file an ET3 by the 20th of June 2025, accompanied by an application to extend time to present a response. The ...
Compensation
Employer
Case Details
- Case Number
- 6017817/2024
- Decision Date
- 20/07/2025
- Published
- 29/07/2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dowling