6037009/2025Struck out

Jaguar Land Rover Ltd

27 April 2026·Employment Tribunal·England & Wales·Employment Judge Hindmarch

Respondent

Jaguar Land Rover Ltd

All cases →

Decision date

27 April 2026

Tribunal

Employment Tribunal

Jurisdiction

England & Wales

Judge

Employment Judge Hindmarch

Case Summary

The claimant brought a complaint of unfair dismissal against Jaguar Land Rover Limited. The tribunal struck out the complaint because the claimant had less than two years' service with the respondent, failing to meet the statutory qualifying period required by section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.

Why this outcome?

No qualifying employment period

The claimant was employed for less than two years. Section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 requires not less than two years' service to bring an unfair dismissal complaint (subject to certain exceptions). The claimant failed to give an acceptable reason why the complaint should not be struck out.

Claim Types

Related claim guides

Use these claim-type pages to compare this decision with other published tribunal cases, outcome patterns, and visible award data.

See unfair dismissal compensation data

Key Issues

  • Whether claimant had qualifying period of two years' service for unfair dismissal claim
  • Section 108 Employment Rights Act 1996 requirement

Original published judgment

The full source document is available from the official publication page.

Something doesn't look right?

Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.