Intervision Gaming (UK) Ltd (T/a The Razz)
Case Summary
The claimant was employed by the respondent as a Night Shift Supervisor from 12 August to 30 September 2024 when she was summarily dismissed. She brought claims of direct race discrimination and wrongful dismissal. The tribunal found that the claimant was not unlawfully discriminated against but was wrongfully dismissed, however she had been fully compensated for her losses.
Key Issues
- •direct race discrimination
- •breach of contract
Claim Types
Cited Laws and Legal Issues
e was summarily dismissed. She brought claims of direct race discrimination and wrongful dismissal. The tribunal found that the cla
Decision Text
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 8002000/2024 Held in Glasgow via Cloud Video Platform (CVP) on 16 & 17 September 2025 Employment Judge Campbell Miss Y Makarova Claimant In Person Intervision Gaming (UK) Limited (Trading as The Razz) Respondent Represented by: Mr N Thomas - Solicitor JUDGMENT OF THE EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNAL 1. The claimant was not unlawfully discriminated against, contrary to section 13 of the Equality Act 2010, and her complaint is dismissed; and 2. The claimant was wrongfully dismissed on 30 September 2024 and her complaint succeeds, but she has been fully compensated for her claimable loss and therefore no award of damages is made. REASONS Introduction 1. This hearing decided a claim raised by the claimant against her former respondent. She was employed between 12 August and 30 September 2024 and on the latter day was summarily dismissed. She submitted complaints of direct race discrimination and breach of contract in relation to her entitlement to notice. 2. The parties had prepared a joint bundle of documents. Numbers in square brackets below correspond to pages in the bundle. 3. The claimant gave evidence on her own behalf. She intended to call a former colleague named Cameron Russell as a witness. He was to join on the second day of the hearing as he had a commitment on the first. He joined at the beginning of the second day, but claimed that the camera on his mobile 8002000/2024 Page 2 telephone was not working, and so could be heard but not seen. He could see those in the hearing however. The parties agreed that the individual speaking was Mr Russell and that they were content for him to proceed. We therefore began ...
Employer
Employment Details
- Industry
- gaming
- Representation
- Litigant in person
Case Details
- Case Number
- 8002000/2024
- Decision Date
- 04/10/2025
- Published
- 02/02/2026
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Campbell