East Dunbartonshire Council

Case Summary

The claimant was employed as a Policy Adviser and alleged she was unfairly dismissed, automatically unfairly dismissed for making a protected disclosure, and subjected to detriment for making a protected disclosure. The tribunal dismissed all of the claimant's complaints.

The tribunal heard the full case and rejected all three complaints on their merits: the claimant failed to establish that she was subjected to detriment for making a protected disclosure, that her dismissal was automatically unfair under the whistleblowing provisions, or that her dismissal was unfair.

Use these claim-type pages to compare this decision with other published tribunal cases, outcome patterns, and visible award data.

• •The claimant was subjected to detriment on the ground of having made a protected disclosure
• •the dismissal of the claimant was automatically unfair for making a protected disclosure
• •The claimant was unfairly dismissed

The full source document is available from the official publication page.