Latest tribunal judgments.

Countrywide Surveyors Ltd: 6000403/2025

A consent judgment in a preliminary hearing where the claimant agreed to pay the respondent £1,000 in full and final settlement of all costs incurred in the proceedings.

Learning Matters Trust Ltd and ARAG Legal Expenses Company Ltd: 2502221/2023

The claimant brought claims against Learning Matters Trust Ltd and ARAG Legal Expenses Company Limited. The proceedings were stayed by consent pending settlement ratification through ACAS COT3.

West Hertfordshire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust and Others: 3302627/2025 and Others: 3302627/2025

The claimant, former Chief Finance Officer of West Hertfordshire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, brought claims for race discrimination and whistleblowing detriment arising from critical letters sent in February 2024. The tribunal struck out the claims on the grounds that they have no reasonable prospect of success, finding that claims relating to events before 11 June 2024 were settled by a binding settlement agreement, and that the claimant's arguments regarding fraudulent misrepresentation and economic duress were not made out.

Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust: 1306556/2024

A remedy hearing following a finding of unfair dismissal and sex discrimination against an NHS mental health trust. The tribunal ordered reinstatement of a Band 6 Crisis Transformation Nurse to her former role, arrears of pay calculated with specified pay rises and deductions, and an injury to feelings award of £18,000 plus interest. The tribunal also made a recommendation for management training on women's health issues.

Cotsworld Facilities Company Ltd: 6048646/2025

The claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment of £11,003.85 following redundancy after 14 years of service at age 46. The payment was calculated as 16.5 weeks' pay (based on statutory redundancy entitlement) multiplied by weekly pay of £666.90, with all figures agreed by both parties.

First Hydrogen Ltd and Others: 6013801/2024

The claimant brought a claim for unauthorised deductions from wages against First Hydrogen Ltd, First Hydrogen Corporation, Mr Balraj Mann and Mr Edward Low. The parties agreed by consent that the complaint was well-founded and the respondents were ordered to pay the claimant £180,087.10, being the gross sum deducted.

Health And Safety Executive: 1600134/2017

This is a health and safety appeal case, not an employment law matter. The claimant (the claimant) appealed against a Prohibition Notice issued by the Health and Safety Executive. By consent of the parties, the Prohibition Notice was cancelled without determination of the merits.

Zotefoams plc: 6020985/2024

A preliminary hearing determining whether to strike out the claimant's claims for lack of reasonable prospects of success or due to unreasonable conduct of proceedings, and whether to award a deposit. The tribunal rejected both strike out applications and declined to award a deposit, finding that the claimant's case should be heard on its merits despite concerns about witness availability and conduct issues.

Ocean Hill Lodge Ltd: 6030478/2025

The claimant obtained judgment against Ocean Hill Lodge Ltd for £3937.50, which the respondent acknowledged as due.

Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust: 2305663/2023

The claimant brought a claim for unlawful wage deductions by his employer, Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust, during the period 22 May 2023 to 21 July 2023. The tribunal found that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages contrary to section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and ordered payment of £1,782.60 gross by consent.

John Lewis PLC: [2026] EAT 59

The claimant legally changed his name by deed poll between obtaining an early conciliation certificate and presenting his ET1 claim form, resulting in different names appearing on the two documents. The Employment Tribunal rejected the claim under Rule 12(1)(e). The EAT allowed the appeal by consent, holding that the tribunal erred by failing to consider whether the claimant made an error in relation to a name under Rule 12(2A) and by failing to consider whether Rule 6 entitled it to waive the requirement.

Nevill Golf Club: 2309848/2025

The claimant claimed an unauthorised deduction from wages. The respondent conceded the claim in the sum of £84.00 gross pay. The tribunal found that the respondent's deduction of 30 hours from the payment made on 17 October 2025 was lawful, as it corrected an overpayment arising from a transposition error in calculating the claimant's hours worked in August 2025.

Dunbia (UK): 6025506/2025

The parties reached a settlement by consent. The hearing was adjourned to allow implementation of the agreed settlement terms. The claim shall stand dismissed if no application is made by 1 June 2026.

B J Dixon - HM Inspector of Health and Safety: 2501135/2025

This is a health and safety matter concerning an appeal against a Prohibition Notice. The parties reached a settlement by consent, and the tribunal allowed the appeal and cancelled the Prohibition Notice with no order for costs.

B Braun Sterilog Ltd and Synergy Health (UK) Ltd T/a Steris Instrument Processing: 6014831/2024

The claimant's claim against the first respondent (B Braun Sterilog Ltd) was dismissed by consent following a transfer of the claimant's employment to the second respondent (Synergy Health (UK) Ltd t/a Steris Instrument Processing). The second respondent accepted liability for the claim if it succeeds.

HF Trust Ltd: 1600323/2025

The claimant's claim of automatic unfair dismissal for protected public interest disclosure was withdrawn. The tribunal found the claimant was unfairly dismissed on 21 November 2024 for conduct-related reasons with procedural unfairness, but reduced both basic and compensatory awards by 50% due to the claimant's conduct. The parties settled the claim for £8,737.21 net.

Union of Shop, Distributive and Allied Workers (USDAW): 2400805/2025

The claimant challenged his exclusion from membership of USDAW (Union of Shop, Distributive and Allied Workers) in 2024. By consent, the tribunal declared that the exclusion was not permitted by section 174 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 and found the complaint well-founded.

Hexaform Construction Ltd: 6011760/2025

The claimant brought claims against Hexaform Construction Limited for unauthorised wage deductions, unpaid holiday entitlement, wrongful dismissal without proper notice, and unpaid contractual expenses. By consent and following oral judgment, the tribunal ordered the respondent to pay a total of £11,770.26 in damages and unpaid sums.

Brentford Property Investments Ltd: 6019213/2024

The claimant brought claims for unfair dismissal, statutory redundancy pay, notice pay, holiday pay and arrears of pay following termination of employment on 24 June 2024. The respondent admitted liability for redundancy pay, notice pay and holiday pay totalling £17,561.25. The claimant withdrew the unfair dismissal claim in light of the respondent's admissions.

Ministry of Defence: 6014320/2024

The claimant claimed outstanding holiday pay from the Ministry of Defence. The claim was well-founded by consent of the respondent. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £264.33 within 14 days with no further deduction for tax or national insurance.

University of South Wales Higher Education Corporation: 6002713/2025

The Settlement Agreement entered into by the parties dated 10 June 2025 is validly entered into and therefore the Claimant's claim cannot proceed and the claim is dismissed.

Kantar UK Ltd: 1300614/2019

The claimant applied for reconsideration of a judgment dismissing his claim following an Acas settlement in February 2020, claiming he lacked capacity at the time. The tribunal refused the reconsideration application on the basis that there was no reasonable prospect of the original decision being varied or revoked, noting that once a claim is withdrawn it cannot be reinstated, and the medical evidence did not support the claim of incapacity in February 2020.

Kronospan Ltd: 1600113/2024

The claimant was dismissed on 15 December 2025 and brought claims for wrongful dismissal and unfair dismissal for a conduct-related reason. The tribunal found both claims well-founded. The parties settled the remedy claim for a total of £26,017.54, comprising basic award, compensatory award, and wrongful dismissal damages, all subject to 50% reductions for the Polkey principle and contributory fault.

Verve People: 2402009/2024

The claimant brought claims against Verve People. The tribunal dismissed the claims on the basis that it lacked jurisdiction because the parties had agreed terms of settlement via ACAS on 21 June 2024.

B J Dixon - HM Inspector of Health and Safety: 2501118/2025

The claimant company appealed against a Prohibition Notice issued by the respondent, HM Inspector of Health and Safety. The parties agreed terms of settlement and the Tribunal allowed the appeal, cancelling the Prohibition Notice.

Conti Fish Bar (UK) Ltd: 6036717/2025

The claimant claimed unpaid accrued holiday pay and failure to provide a statement of employment particulars against Conti Fish Bar (UK) Ltd. By consent, the claimant's claim for unpaid holiday pay was upheld and the respondent agreed to pay £850 gross. The claim for failure to provide employment particulars was withdrawn and dismissed.

London Borough of Islington: [2026] EAT 11

The appellant was employed by the respondent at a school operated by the respondent. She raised a safeguarding issue and complained to OFSTED about practices at the school. She maintained that her complaints were protected disclosures. She left her employment at the school on 25 May 2021. Following the provision of a negative reference by the school, the appellant caused a letter before action to be sent in which she alleged that she had been subjected to detriment on the ground of having made a protected disclosure. Following negotiations through ACAS, a COT3 agreement was entered into. The Employment Tribunal held that the COT3 barred her from bringing a claim related to her non-appointment at a different school operated by the respondent.

Tidenham Royal British Legion Club Ltd: 1603168/2025

The claimant's claim of unfair dismissal is well founded. The claimant was unfairly dismissed by the respondent. Parties have agreed remedy and this has been resolved by a COT agreement.

Drax Power Ltd: 6029828/2025

The claimant was dismissed for redundancy while on maternity leave and entered into a COT3 agreement. The tribunal is determining whether the claimant has a reasonable prospect of successfully applying to set aside the COT3 agreement.

Butterfly Bloom Ltd: 6026301/2025

The claimant's redundancy claim was settled, with a payment of £723.58.

KPMG LLP: 6013745/2025 and 6020154/2025: 6013745/2025

The Claimant sought reconsideration of the Tribunal's judgment dated 30 July 2025 dismissing her claims 6013745/2025 and 6020154/2025 following a settlement agreement (COT3). The Tribunal found that the Claimant had not presented evidence indicating the COT3 settlement should be set aside, and that there were no reasonable grounds to reconsider the judgment.

Lakeside Healthcare: 3305332/2024

The case was settled on 13 December 2024 under ACAS auspices with a COT3 Agreement. The claimant succeeded in her whistleblowing claim.

DWP: 6019126/2024

The claimant's holiday pay and breach of contract claims were settled by consent, with the respondent agreeing to pay the claimant £378. The remaining claims are disputed.

New Hope Care Ltd: 6006771/2025

Employment Judge Camp settled the case in favor of the claimant, ordering New Hope Care Ltd to pay £3,541.13 due to unauthorised deductions from wages and a breach of contract regarding pension contributions.

Briggate Service Garage Ltd: 3300003/2025

The case involved the dismissal of the claimant from Briggate Service Garage Ltd, where she worked as Office Manager. The business was sold and Mr Cornell could not secure her role in the new ownership. The claim for constructive unfair dismissal and automatic constructive unfair dismissal related to the TUPE transfer, but both claims were dismissed.

Is You Ltd: 2207100/2021

The case was settled by consent with the respondent agreeing to pay the claimant £3,700 for unauthorised wage deductions.

Newcastle University: 2500668/2023 and 2502011/2023: 2500668/2023

The case involved claims of maternity and pregnancy discrimination, unfair dismissal, notice pay, and redundancy payment. All claims were withdrawn or dismissed on the grounds of time limits, withdrawal, or lack of reasonable prospect of success.

Kingshurst Parish Council: 6015667/2024

The Employment Tribunal dismissed the claimant's claims on the basis of issue estoppel or abuse of process.

Ai4Process Ltd: 3308767/2024

The case involved unauthorised deductions and a breach of contract claim. The claim for an unauthorised deduction was settled, while other claims were dismissed.

PW Trading Ltd: 6013903/2025

The claim for unpaid salary, accrued holiday, and business expenses was settled by consent with the respondent agreeing to pay a total of £4562.44.