Employment tribunal success rates by claim type
Claimant success rates by employment tribunal claim type in published UK judgments, with sample-size caveats, compensation context, and links to claim-specific guides.
Claim types
25
10+ case sample
Largest sample
9,179
Unfair Dismissal
Top success
91.8%
Protective Award
Top median
£13,495
116 compensated cases
What the data says
In this analysis, Tribunal Intel is drawing on 38,402 claim-type tags from published employment tribunal judgments. To avoid drawing conclusions from tiny samples, this insight only ranks claim types with at least 10 tagged published cases. That leaves 38,402 tagged case appearances across 25 claim types.
On that filtered view, Protective Award has the highest claimant success rate at 91.8% across 182 tagged cases. That does not make it an “easy” claim; it means that, among published judgments currently indexed here, claimant-successful or partially-successful outcomes are more common in that tagged set.
The largest claim-type sample is Unfair Dismissal with 9,179 tagged cases. Its scale makes it useful for directional reading, but it also means the category mixes many factual situations, procedural histories, and remedies stages.
The practical takeaway is to read success rate, sample size, and compensation together. A small category with a high success rate may be less useful for planning than a larger category with a lower but more stable rate. A high average award can also be driven by a few exceptional cases rather than the ordinary value of that claim type. Median compensation is usually more stable, but it is still not reliable when only a handful of successful cases include recorded awards.
Claim types with the highest claimant success rates
Protective Award
182 cases · 167 claimant-successful / partially successful cases
91.8%
median £3,402 · avg £7,510 · 38 of those have compensation
Unlawful Deduction
5,810 cases · 4,411 claimant-successful / partially successful cases
75.9%
median £1,870 · avg £4,939 · 3,332 of those have compensation
Working Time
160 cases · 121 claimant-successful / partially successful cases
75.6%
median £1,671 · avg £3,705 · 71 of those have compensation
Redundancy Pay
1,448 cases · 1,088 claimant-successful / partially successful cases
75.1%
median £4,200 · avg £6,743 · 713 of those have compensation
Breach Of Contract
6,159 cases · 3,945 claimant-successful / partially successful cases
64.1%
median £2,800 · avg £9,441 · 2,323 of those have compensation
Reasonable Adjustments
25 cases · 16 claimant-successful / partially successful cases
64.0%
median £6,032 · avg £6,032 · 2 of those have compensation
Tupe
80 cases · 51 claimant-successful / partially successful cases
63.7%
median £6,402 · avg £11,381 · 17 of those have compensation
Discrimination Pregnancy
269 cases · 150 claimant-successful / partially successful cases
55.8%
median £10,573 · avg £13,923 · 48 of those have compensation
Harassment
1,087 cases · 486 claimant-successful / partially successful cases
44.7%
median £5,310 · avg £11,464 · 59 of those have compensation
Constructive Dismissal
1,482 cases · 628 claimant-successful / partially successful cases
42.4%
median £6,000 · avg £14,365 · 130 of those have compensation
Unfair Dismissal
9,179 cases · 3,739 claimant-successful / partially successful cases
40.7%
median £4,784 · avg £15,378 · 1,008 of those have compensation
Victimisation
1,127 cases · 427 claimant-successful / partially successful cases
37.9%
median £10,601 · avg £118,362 · 34 of those have compensation
How to use this insight
Start with sample size
A larger sample usually gives a more stable signal. Treat small categories as prompts for reading cases, not as a headline probability.
Compare claim mix
Many judgments involve multiple claim types. Use the claim label to find comparable cases, then inspect what actually drove the outcome.
Look beyond winning
A claim type can show a solid success rate but low average compensation, or a lower rate with occasional large awards. Both are commercially relevant.
Was this useful?
No comments yet