Latest tribunal judgments.

O’Loughlin Commercials Ltd: 3304564/2025

The claimant, an HGV driver, claimed unfair dismissal following an argument with transport manager Tony Murphy over working hours on 27 February 2025, during which he was told he was sacked. The tribunal found the claimant was not dismissed unfairly, dismissing his claim. The judgment addresses issues of continuous employment, dismissal versus resignation, procedural compliance, and the fairness of the dismissal within the range of reasonable responses.

Ace 24 Healthcare: 6012145/2026

The claimant applied for interim relief in proceedings against Ace 24 Healthcare. The tribunal refused the application for interim relief.

Forward (Wales) Ltd: 6017288/2025

The claimant brought claims of failure to make reasonable adjustments for disability, unfavourable treatment arising from disability, and unfair dismissal against Forward (Wales) Limited. The tribunal dismissed the reasonable adjustments complaint but found the disability-related treatment complaint and unfair dismissal claim well-founded.

Relltek Ltd: 6009880/2024

The claimant was employed as Professional Services Director by Relltek Limited, an IT services company, from February 2022 to May 2024, when he was summarily dismissed for gross misconduct. The claimant disputed the allegations and argued the dismissal was unfair due to procedural defects, including an allegedly biased investigator and fabricated meeting minutes. The tribunal dismissed all claims for unfair dismissal, wrongful dismissal, and unlawful deduction of wages.

Oatlands Academy CIC: 6039843/2025

The claimant brought claims for unlawful wage deductions, breach of contract regarding dismissal notice, and unpaid holiday entitlement. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the tribunal determined the claim under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure. The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £4,760.31 in total comprising £2,775.07 for wage deductions, £640.40 for breach of contract damages, and £1,344.84 for unpaid holiday.

LHR Airports Ltd: 3300526/2024

The claimant, a Muslim Security Officer of Palestinian affiliation, brought claims of direct discrimination, harassment, and victimisation arising from her employment at LHR Airports Ltd following an incident involving her Palestinian flag badge in November 2023. The tribunal found all claims not well-founded, concluding that the claimant's deep Palestinian affiliation coloured her interpretation of events and that she was not a reliable recaller of facts.

Tribu Hair Studio Ltd: 6032196/2025

The claimant claimed unpaid wages including accrued holiday pay and an unpaid bonus balance from 2024. The tribunal found the respondent liable for unauthorised wage deductions of £1201.41 and breach of contract in failing to pay the outstanding bonus of £1900.00, finding the bonus agreement was unconditional and could not be withheld for alleged subsequent misconduct.

Portofino London Ltd: 6001234/2026

The claimant brought a claim for unlawful wage deductions. The respondent failed to present a response, resulting in Rule 22(3) applying. The tribunal found the claim well-founded and ordered the respondent to pay £43 net and £2,500 gross in respect of unauthorised wage deductions.

Lantain Ltd and A G Sandry: 2300946/2026

The claimant applied for interim relief following his resignation on 10 May 2026, claiming constructive unfair dismissal and whistleblowing detriments after making protected disclosures about breaches of national minimum wage, health and safety, and working time regulations between February and May 2026. Employment Judge Sudra refused the application, finding that based on the evidence available, the tribunal could not conclude the claimant had a pretty good chance of success in the substantive claim, as the factual dispute between the parties (whether the alleged detriments were caused by the protected disclosures or by business efficacy reasons) was too complex to assess at the interim relief stage.

Manger Moi Ltd: 2311750/2024

The claimant brought complaints of unauthorised wage deductions and indirect sex discrimination against the respondent. The tribunal found the wage deduction complaint well-founded and awarded £60 for the deducted sum plus £480 under section 38 Employment Act 2002 for breach of duty to provide written employment particulars. The indirect sex discrimination complaint was dismissed.

Jasmin Thai Ltd: 2501497/2025

The claimant claimed against Jasmin Thai Ltd for unlawful wage deductions, breach of contract dismissal, redundancy entitlement, unpaid holiday, and failure to provide pay statements. The respondent failed to submit a valid response on time, and the tribunal determined the claim under Rule 22, finding in favour of the claimant on all monetary claims totalling £3,445.04.

Ryanair DAC and Ryanair UK Ltd: 3203235/2022

The claimant, a Black pilot employed by Ryanair between February 2019 and May 2024, claimed direct race discrimination, victimisation, unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal. The tribunal dismissed the race discrimination claims but found victimisation succeeding on three specific issues (grievance rejection terms, grievance appeal outcome, and the 1 July 2022 bar on CU consideration), and found the dismissal procedurally unfair though concluded there would have been a 100% chance of fair dismissal had proper procedure been followed, resulting in no compensatory award but a basic award reduced by 75% for contributory conduct.

Brickowner Ltd: 6030617/2025

The claimant brought claims for unauthorised deductions from wages and redundancy payment against Brickowner Limited. The tribunal found the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and bonus in May and June 2025, and was entitled to a redundancy payment. The respondent was ordered to pay £14,203.83 in total.

IAG Cargo Ltd: 3306475/2024 and 6044468/2025: 3306475/2024

This is a costs judgment following an earlier hearing. The claimant's application for costs is allowed and the respondent is ordered to pay the claimant £3,635. The reasons were given orally at the hearing on 18 February 2026.

Kanki Turkish Meze and Cocktail Bar Ltd: 6025147/2025

The claimant claimed discrimination and unlawful wage deduction against his employer. The claimant failed to attend the hearing on 28 May 2026, having emailed on 21 May 2026 stating he could not attend due to his mother's critical illness abroad, but failed to comply with procedural requirements to copy the respondent on his postponement request. The tribunal dismissed the claims under rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024, finding the claimant was not intent on pursuing his claims.

Willerby Holiday Homes Ltd: 6041506/2025

The claimant brought a complaint of pregnancy or maternity discrimination against Willerby Holiday Homes Limited. The employment tribunal struck out the complaint under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2024 as having no reasonable prospect of success.

I: 6018520/2024 and 6015760/2024: 6018520/2024

The claimant brought claims for sexual harassment, victimisation, whistleblowing detriment, health and safety detriment, and unfair dismissal against the respondent. The tribunal heard evidence over 8 days in April 2026 and deliberated in May 2026. All claims were dismissed as not well-founded in this liability judgment.

Primark Stores Ltd: 6012811/2025

The claimant brought complaints of unfair dismissal and direct race and/or religion discrimination against Primark Stores Limited following his dismissal. The tribunal found the claimant's complaint of unfair dismissal was not well founded and dismissed his complaints of direct race and religion discrimination.

Driven Personnel Ltd: 6009338/2025

The claimant applied for reconsideration of a judgment concerning unpaid holiday pay, seeking to amend it to include a finding that he was an employee rather than a worker. The tribunal refused the application as it was made significantly out of time and, in any event, employment status was never an issue raised in the original claim or addressed in the judgment.

Ormiston Academies Trust and Others: 2402708/2020 and Others: 2402708/2020

The claims brought by Julie Crellin, Ellis Greenwood, and Jayne Thompson against Ormiston Academies Trust and related academies were struck out under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. The Tribunal found the claims had not been actively pursued, and after warning the claimants and giving them an opportunity to respond, which they failed to do, the Tribunal struck out the claims.

The Commissioner of the Police of the Metropolis: 2306290/2024

This is a preliminary hearing in a disability discrimination case brought by a police officer against the Metropolitan Police. The tribunal determined that the claimant was disabled for the purposes of the Equality Act 2010 from 6 January 2023. The tribunal refused the claimant's application to amend his Particulars of Claim to add five further particulars, with reasons for the disability determination given orally at the hearing.

Home Office: 6020810/2025

The claimant brought a complaint of unfair dismissal against the Home Office. The tribunal heard evidence over three days in May 2026. The claimant's unfair dismissal complaint was found to be not well-founded and dismissed.

Stark Technical Services Ltd and Others: 6041427/2025

The claimant withdrew her sex discrimination claim against respondent Carl Dixon. The tribunal dismissed the whistleblowing detriment claims as no particulars of the claim were provided in the original claim form and an application to amend was refused on 27 May 2026.

Elissa Motors Ltd (T/a Budgen Motors): 1303178/2025

The claimant brought a claim of direct discrimination against Elissa Motors Limited (t/a Budgen Motors) on the grounds of her protected characteristic of marriage. The tribunal heard evidence on 26th and 27th May 2025 and found the claim was not well founded, dismissing it.

The Retreats (Cambridge) Ltd: 6008209/2024

The claimant brought claims for automatic unfair dismissal and pregnancy and maternity discrimination. The pregnancy discrimination claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. The automatic unfair dismissal claim succeeded by consent, and the respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £3,742.15 as a compensatory award.

NHS England: 6004312/2024

The claimant claimed disability discrimination, failure to make reasonable adjustments, and victimisation against NHS England following a failed progression and redeployment process. The tribunal found that while aspects of the respondent's handling were unsatisfactory, the statutory tests under sections 15, 20 and 27 of the Equality Act 2010 were not established, and accordingly dismissed the claims.

Compass Cleaning Solutions Ltd: 6009532/2024

The claimant's claim against Compass Cleaning Solutions Ltd was struck out under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. The tribunal had issued a warning letter on 27th January 2026 advising that the claim might be struck out due to non-compliance with previous tribunal orders and failure to actively pursue the claim. The claimant failed to respond to the warning letter, and the tribunal proceeded to strike out the claim on 28th May 2026.

Supernova Resourcing: 6010128/2024

The claimant's claim against Supernova Resourcing was struck out under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. The tribunal issued a warning letter on 26 January 2026 notifying the claimant that it was considering striking out the claim due to lack of active pursuit and because the identity of the respondent was unknown. The claimant failed to respond by the deadline of 9 February 2026, and the tribunal proceeded to strike out the claim.

The Bishop Wheeler Catholic Academy Trust: 6014422/2026

The claimant's claim was struck out under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 because the claimant had been employed for less than two years and therefore lacked the qualifying period required to bring the claim. The claimant was given an opportunity to respond to a strike-out warning but failed to reply.

Parallel Security Ltd and 3RIO Group Ltd (in liquidation): 2402230/2024

The claimant succeeded in claims for unauthorised wage deductions totalling £2,578, unpaid holiday pay of £830, and a 20% uplift of £681 due to the respondent's unreasonable failure to comply with the ACAS Code. Additionally, both respondents were jointly and severally liable for £6,000 compensation (13 weeks gross pay) for failure to comply with TUPE consultation requirements.

Da’aro Youth Project: 6003889/2024 and 6021631/2024: 6003889/2024

The claimant, aged 73, brought claims against Da'aro Youth Project for direct age discrimination, harassment related to age, victimisation, constructive unfair dismissal, constructive discriminatory dismissal, wrongful dismissal and failure to provide a written statement of terms. The tribunal found all complaints failed and were dismissed, with no compensation awarded. The respondent's applications for costs and wasted costs were dismissed upon withdrawal.

L.L.T. Foods Ltd (in voluntary liquidation): 6012512/2025

The claimant brought a claim for unauthorised deductions from wages relating to arrears of pay. The respondent company was in voluntary liquidation and did not contest the claim. The tribunal found the claim succeeded and ordered the respondent to pay arrears of £7,176.89.

Kier Ltd: 6026175/2025

The claimant, a mixed race Commercial Administrator employed by Kier Ltd, brought claims for harassment related to race, victimisation, and direct race discrimination arising from her employment from November 2024 to July 2025. The tribunal dismissed all three claims as not well founded after a five-day hearing, finding no prima facie case of discrimination and no victimisation.

Dawat-E-Islami: 6025015/2025

The claimant, a head teacher, was dismissed for making racial and discriminatory comments to students on 2 May 2025. The tribunal found the dismissal was fair, holding that the respondent had a genuine belief in the misconduct, reasonable grounds for that belief, conducted a reasonable investigation, and that dismissal was within the range of reasonable responses for gross misconduct by a head teacher in an Islamic school. Both claims (unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal) were dismissed.

E1 Cornershop Ltd: 6007887/2026

The tribunal substituted E1 Cornershop Limited as the respondent to the claim. The claimant's application for Interim Relief under sections 128-129 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was refused.

S & T Pub Company Ltd: 6034482/2025

The claimant's employment tribunal claim against S & T Pub Company Limited was dismissed on 26 May 2026 because the claimant failed to attend the hearing.

Leviat Ltd: 6005348/2024

At a preliminary hearing, the claimant's claims for constructive unfair dismissal and disability-related harassment were struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success. The claimant was ordered to pay deposits of £150 each to continue pursuing claims of sex discrimination and failure to make reasonable adjustments.

Turning Tide: 6019321/2024

The claimant brought claims for breach of contract (while still employed), breach of GDPR, privacy and/or confidentiality against the respondent. The tribunal dismissed all claims for want of jurisdiction, finding it lacked power to hear them.

T B Whyte: 6016659/2026

The claimant applied for interim relief pending the determination of her claim of unfair dismissal against Thomas Boyde Whyte. The tribunal dismissed the application for interim relief.

London Healthcare Locums Ltd (in liquidation): 6032552/2025

The claimant presented a claim for unlawful wage deductions against London Healthcare Locums Limited (in liquidation). The respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The tribunal determined that unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages had been made and ordered the respondent to pay £5,747.50 gross.