Back to Blog
Guide4 min read

Employment Appeal Tribunal decisions: what they are and why they matter

A practical guide to what the Employment Appeal Tribunal does, what usually gets appealed, and how to use EAT judgments on Tribunal Intel.

Visible EAT decisions

93

currently surfaced in Tribunal Intel's public dataset

Core question

Law

EAT appeals are about arguable legal error, not simply rerunning the facts

Usual deadline

42 days

from the written reasons or other appealable decision in the usual case

Fastest way in

Filter

use the Tribunal Level filter to isolate appeal-stage decisions

What the EAT actually does

The Employment Appeal Tribunal sits above the Employment Tribunal. Its job is not to rehear every dispute from scratch. Its main job is to decide whether the tribunal below made an arguable error of law.

In practical terms, that usually means asking questions like: did the tribunal apply the right legal test, give adequate reasons, take account of the correct legal framework, or reach a conclusion that was legally open to it on the evidence?

That is why EAT decisions are useful even if you are not running an appeal yourself. They show which tribunal mistakes matter, which arguments survive scrutiny on appeal, and which issues are really being fought when a case moves beyond first instance.

What usually gets appealed

Wrong legal test

The tribunal may have identified the issue correctly but applied the wrong legal standard, burden, or framework.

Inadequate reasons

Some appeals focus on whether the reasons are sufficient to explain why the tribunal reached its result.

Procedural unfairness

Appeal points can arise where the hearing process itself is said to have been unfair in a way that affected the outcome.

Perverse outcome

In a smaller set of cases, the argument is that the result was not one a properly directed tribunal could have reached on the evidence.

Why EAT judgments are useful commercially

For claimant lawyers, respondent lawyers, in-house teams, and founders watching litigation risk, EAT judgments are useful because they show how contested points are framed at the highest routinely published employment level below the Court of Appeal.

They also help you separate one-off factual disputes from repeat legal issues. If the same procedural or doctrinal point keeps appearing in appeal judgments, that is often a stronger signal than one dramatic first-instance result.

Put differently: ET judgments tell you what happened in a case. EAT judgments are often better for understanding why the legal argument mattered.

Recent Employment Appeal Tribunal decisions

[2025] EAT 206

1) Mr Rohit Vikal 2) Emma Victoria Limited t a Shapins Clinic v Miss April Freke: [2025] EAT 206

25 Nov 2026

Open case
[2026] EAT 50

Mr A Boateng v Moss Bros Group Ltd: [2026] EAT 50

2 Apr 2026

Open case
[2026] EAT 47

Mr S Khakimov v Amova Asset Management UK Ltd ("formerly Nikko Asset Management Europe Ltd"): [2026] EAT 47

27 Mar 2026

Open case
[2026] EAT 46

K J v British Council: [2026] EAT 46

25 Mar 2026

Open case
[2026] EAT 43

Mr A Whitaker v 1. White Rose Academies Trust 2. Luminate Education Group: [2026] EAT 43

20 Mar 2026

Open case
[2026] EAT 42

Ms Rukhsana Pasha v The Home Office: [2026] EAT 42

17 Mar 2026

Open case

How to use EAT coverage on Tribunal Intel

If you want appeal-stage cases only, go straight to the Employment Appeal Tribunal filter.

That is the fastest way to isolate EAT judgments, compare them with first-instance tribunal decisions, and trace how a disputed employment issue develops on appeal.